Will Raywood, author

  • Home
  • Books
    • Jamie Genius Writes a Novel
    • Trust Your Story
    • Natural Laws of Story
    • Extras
    • Free e-book
  • Newsletter
  • Blog
  • My Story
  • About
  • Privacy Policy

Forget AI: Stephen King’s routine is what you need to write a novel fast

11 June 2026 by willraywood.com 1 Comment

It took me three years to write my first novel, and it wasn’t even good. Then I tried Stephen King’s famously productive routine, and it changed everything. King has written more than 60 novels and novellas, plus over 200 short stories. While most published authors write one book a year, he writes a full novel in about three months.

What’s his secret? I followed the advice he outlines in On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, and what I discovered may surprise you. Here’s my four-step plan to finish a novel in under three months.

Step One: Start With a Strong Premise

First, you need an idea for your book. The good news is that you don’t need a fully formed story to start writing. King begins with a situation. He asks, “What if?” What if a high school girl had telekinetic powers? (Carrie). What if a writer were held captive by his “number one fan”? (Misery).

When it comes to the writing process, there are two broad types of writers: plotters and discovery writers, also known as pantsers. Plotters develop a detailed plan before drafting. They know their characters’ backstories, goals, and secrets, and they understand how the story will unfold and resolve.

King belongs to the discovery writers. He doesn’t plan his stories in detail. Instead, he trusts his instincts and improvises as events unfold, following the story wherever it leads. He writes,

Plot is […] the good writer’s last resort and the dullard’s first choice.

Many debut writers feel stuck because they believe they need a groundbreaking idea, an original theme, and a detailed outline before they can even begin. King argues the opposite. Clarity comes during the writing process, not before it. For him, writing isn’t the reward for having a good idea; it’s the method by which good ideas are discovered.

Even if you’re a plotter, you can still use King’s routine. In fact, plotters can often write novels even faster than three months. I’ve done it myself, no AI needed, but that’s a topic for another video.

Step Two: Learn to Write Well… and Fast

Once you have a story idea, the next stage is the most important one: write the first draft without interruption.

King writes six pages every day, roughly 2000 words. That may sound like a lot, but it’s entirely doable, even with a full-time job and a busy family life. You need two things: the ability to write fast and a routine you can sustain for several weeks.

Some writers believe that writing fast means sacrificing quality. In fiction, the opposite is often true. Writing quickly can produce prose that feels more spontaneous and alive. Many famous works were written in bursts of creative energy. Robert Louis Stevenson wrote The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in just a few days. Ray Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in nine days. Stephen King himself drafted The Running Man in a single week.

The surprising part is that anyone can learn to write faster. When I started, I struggled to write 200 words an hour. With practice, that number steadily increased. Many writers produce 500 to 1000 words an hour, and with certain techniques, even more. If you can write 1000 words an hour, you only need a couple of hours a day to hit that six-page goal.

One powerful technique is freewriting, which has been around for almost a century and used by many great writers. Try this: choose a topic you care about and write as fast as you can for two minutes without stopping. Don’t worry about grammar or sentence structure. Don’t analyze. Just keep writing whatever comes to mind.

You may be surprised to discover that your true feelings about the topic differ from what you thought. Freewriting bypasses the conscious mind and reveals deeper truths beneath the surface. This is a key part of discovery writing.

Writing fast can feel incredibly liberating. Don’t worry if the results are rough or even nonsensical. You’ll revise them later, in step four. During drafting, your only goal is to give voice to your characters and explore their deepest fears, desires, and anxieties.

Step Three: Build a Daily Writing Routine

The next step is to create a routine that allows you to write every day without interruptions. King writes in a kind of self-hypnosis, what psychologists call a flow state, where the outside world fades away and you’re fully immersed in the work.

To reach that state, you need a dedicated workspace where you won’t be disturbed. Turn everything off: your phone, email notifications, TV, everything. Clear your desk of distractions, keeping only some water or your favorite drink. King writes with the door closed to shut out the world.

Once you start, don’t stop unless there’s an emergency. If you get stuck on a scene, leave a placeholder and keep writing.

Sound matters, too. King often listens to music while writing or revising. Whether you write with music or in silence is up to you, but if you do use music, make sure it matches the mood of your story. King prefers energetic rock and metal, which suit his style and pace.

The time of day also matters. Set a non-negotiable writing slot. King writes from 8 a.m. to noon, but other authors choose times that fit their lives. Toni Morrison woke at 4 a.m. to write while raising two children. I’ve known writers who worked from 5 to 7 every morning without fail. Night owls may prefer late evenings; writers like Marcel Proust and Franz Kafka worked through the night.

In short, a full-time job, family responsibilities, and a social life are not insurmountable obstacles for motivated writers. If you write at least 1000 words a day, finishing the first draft in three months is entirely realistic.


Ever wondered how some bestselling authors write a full novel in less than a month? Yes, just one month, from the first spark of an idea to a publishable manuscript. It’s not talent or luck.

Subscribe for my newsletter to learn the exact techniques and receive a free e-book as a welcome gift.


Step Four: Revise Your Manuscript

Congratulations! You’ve written the final sentence of the last chapter. But the journey isn’t over yet. King recommends taking a six-week break before revising, though for some writers a week or two is enough. Distance helps you return to the manuscript with fresh eyes.

Like many writers, I used to dread revisions. Now I enjoy them. This is where you turn a rough diamond into something that shines… or at least something you’re not embarrassed to share.

When revising, ask yourself what the story is really about. What’s the core emotion beneath the surface? In Carrie, it’s humiliation and rage born from bullying. In Misery, it’s the fear of losing creative freedom. In It, it’s the childhood trauma we carry into adulthood.

Do you see a theme or a common thread emerging? Does your manuscript truly serve it? Cut anything that distracts from the story, including unnecessary characters, long exposition, and even entire subplots. This is where King’s advice “kill your darlings” comes in. For him, the final manuscript is the first draft minus ten percent.

He recommends multiple self-editing passes, each focused on a specific aspect such as structure, character, or style. First drafts are supposed to be messy. Rewrite awkward sentences. Keep descriptions tight. As King puts it,

Description begins in the writer’s imagination, but should finish in the reader’s.

Here’s a passage from Doctor Sleep:

Danny left the little room next to his mother’s and crossed the hall. The wind gusted and a dying palm tree beside the building clattered its leaves. The sound was skeletal.

Notice how he uses precise but minimal details. Words like “dying” and “skeletal” deliver emotional impact and set the mood. King is skeptical of adverbs, saying that “the road to hell is paved with adverbs.” He wouldn’t write “the wind gusted sharply,” because “sharply” adds nothing. He wouldn’t write “the boy walked quickly,” but instead chose verbs like hurried, trotted, or darted—more concrete and visual choices.

He also favors active voice. “John gave a rose to Jane” feels more natural than “Jane was given a rose by John,” because we first see the action, then its recipient.

These aren’t rigid rules. Adverbs and passive voice can be effective when used deliberately. Whatever makes your writing more concise and vivid also makes it more engaging.

Book cover: The Natural Laws of Story: Master the Art and Science of Engaging Narratives by Will Raywood

My Own Method for Building Strong Story Arcs: The 4Ps Method

If you follow King’s advice closely, you’ll draft your novel in under three months, take a six-week break, and spend another six weeks revising. I managed to complete my manuscript from start to finish in less than three months.

I’m neither a strict plotter nor a pure discovery writer; I developed my own method for building a strong story arc, which I explain in detail in a recently published writing guide: The Natural Laws of Story. Check it out!

Have you tried Stephen King’s routine? I’d love to hear your thoughts. Leave a comment below!

Filed Under: Creative Writing Tagged With: creative writing advice, discovery writing, first draft tips, how to revise a novel, how to write a novel fast, plotters vs pantsers, Stephen King, story ideas, writing career, writing productivity, writing routine

The AI Trap That Can Kill Your Writing Career

26 April 2026 by willraywood.com Leave a Comment

More than half of the UK’s published novelists believe AI is coming for their jobs, a recent Cambridge study reports. At the same time, a new breed of “writer” brags they can produce a whole book in under an hour.

In a now-infamous New York Times article, “The New Fabio is Claude,” a writer named Coral Hart claimed to have self-published over 200 romance novels in a single year using AI. Specifically, Anthropic’s Claude; yes, the same company authors sued for training its models on pirated books.

Dystopian, isn’t it? She allegedly sold 50,000 copies and earned a six-figure income. The pitch is a masterclass in hustle-culture logic:

If I can generate a book in a day, and you need six months to write a book, who’s going to win the race?

A compelling argument, isn’t it? Because as we all know, success in creative writing is a numbers game. Forget compelling stories. Forget a unique voice. Forget emotional resonance. It’s all about quantity, baby. Just churn it out.

But wait, it gets better.

Coral Hart, entrepreneur extraordinaire, launched a company to teach other aspiring authors her methods. I visited her website and stumbled upon a service so brazen it made me laugh out loud: “Done-for-You Romance.”

Skip the blank page and jump straight into editing. Each Skip-the-Draft package gives you a fully drafted romance manuscript — professionally plotted, written, and ready for your personal touch. Perfect for authors who want to publish faster without starting from scratch.

Whoa. I’m no lawyer, but after years in the publishing trenches, I can tell you this: you can’t copyright a book generated by AI, even with “your personal touch.” Gen-AI output is public domain. Period. This isn’t writing; it’s the digital equivalent of copying Pride and Prejudice, changing a few character names, and slapping your own on the cover.

So, this brings us to the million-dollar question: does this stuff actually sell, and is the risk worth the reward?

Let me be blunt. Using AI to generate novels is the worst decision a writer can make. I’m going to show you precisely why. And if, after reading this, you still want to do it, please do me one favor:

Don’t invite me to the funeral of your writing career.


The Siren Song of the Shortcut

Can you produce an entire novel with generative AI? Yes. Could it be commercially viable? Maybe, if you have a considerable marketing budget.

Look, I’m not anti-AI. I embrace new technology. I was an AI enthusiast myself, and I get the appeal. You have a story burning inside you, but the blank screen can be terrifying. Then, a video flashes across your screen, a snake-oil salesman promising you can write a novel in a single day. It’s an intoxicating promise: bypass the fear, the doubt, the months of agonizing work, and leap straight to the finish line.

But that shortcut comes at a cost that will gut your career before it even begins.


Gold, Gravel, and Brandon Sanderson

Let’s talk economics 101: the scarcity principle. People pay more for things that are valuable and rare. When something is scarce, it’s meaningful. When it’s abundant, it’s disposable. Gold is more valuable than gravel because it’s hard to obtain. Any gold miner or bank robber can tell you that.

Books are no exception.

Fantasy author Brandon Sanderson raised a record-breaking $41.7 million on Kickstarter for four new books. Readers pledged hundreds for a single campaign. Why? Are there not enough fantasy books already?

They pledged that money because they weren’t buying any fantasy book; they were paying for a Sanderson book. They wanted to live in the worlds he created, through the magic of his unique voice. This holds true for any author with a fanbase: they offer something valuable, rare, and inimitable that their readers crave.

AI-generated books are, by their very nature, generic gravel. They are the opposite of scarce. Anyone can produce them. Readers instinctively recognize derivative, soulless content and won’t spend their hard-earned cash on it. And even if they’re duped into buying one, they won’t become a lifelong fan of the “author.” They’ll just feel ripped off.


A Look at the Evidence

“But what about Coral Hart’s six figures?” you ask.

I went to her Amazon page, and… oh, boy. The reader ratings for her recent, AI-generated books are abysmal. That’s not the profile of a bestselling author. A quick trip to Goodreads painted an even bleaker picture: 243 ratings with an average of 1.26 stars.

Trust me, after years in this business: you cannot build a sustainable career with reviews that look like a crime scene.

Curious, I dug deeper. I looked up her other pen names, like Ashleigh Giannoccaro. The picture here is starkly different. The books she published years ago, before generative AI, were much better received. She was already a prolific writer, publishing several books a year the old-fashioned way. My assumption, she had an established career and a following before she switched to the AI firehose.

How did outsourcing their creativity to a machine work out for other AI writers? Here is a representative excerpt from a review for an AI-generated book:

…this book is AI generated. It just lacks any trace of substance or emotional depth that a human author would bring to a story. It just felt like nothing. Merely words on a page.

Merely words on a page. Is that what you got into writing for?


There Is a Better Way

Here’s the secret the AI hustlers won’t tell you: you don’t need AI to write fast and well. You don’t need it to publish multiple novels a year and earn a six-figure income. Stephen King writes a book in under three months. Prolific indie authors were crushing it long before ChatGPT.

Ever wondered how some bestselling authors write a full novel in less than a month? Yes—just one month, from the first spark of an idea to a publishable manuscript. It’s not talent or luck.

Subscribe for my newsletter to learn the exact techniques and receive a free e-book as a welcome gift!


Newsletter

You shouldn’t be asking, “Why should I learn to write when AI can generate a book in an hour?”

Ask, “How do I build a writing career that lasts longer than a TikTok trend?”

Even if AI can generate a book, it cannot generate a career.


Legal Risks of AI-Generated Books

Still tempted? Let’s talk about the legal risks.

For traditional authors: Publishers require that your work is original. AI-generated text is legally not considered original work and cannot be copyrighted. If they discover you’ve used it, they can sue you for breach of contract. You’ll lose your advance, your reputation, and any chance of working with a publisher again.

For indie authors: The risks are just as real. Platforms like Amazon KDP require disclosure of AI-generated content. Failing to do so is a violation of their terms of service. Also, using AI opens you up to copyright, trademark, and unfair-competition lawsuits. Even unintentional copying can get you in hot water.

The penalty? Account termination. And when KDP terminates your account, you aren’t suspended. You are banned. For life. You can’t open another one. Your self-publishing career is dead, burned, and its ashes scattered by the wind.


The Soul of the Matter

What bothers me most in this entire circus is the insidious idea that drafting a novel—the act of creation itself—is a chore. An unpleasant task to be outsourced.

If you’re an author, a true author, then the act of breathing life into characters and building worlds from scratch isn’t a chore; it’s the entire point. It should be a joy. A struggle, yes, but a deeply fulfilling one.

Storytelling has never been just about plot points. At its core, it’s the art of emotional exchange. The most enduring stories are vessels for their author’s unique insight, pain, wonder, and life experience.

Can AI be creative? Why not? After all, even a parrot can talk. AI simulates creativity. But there is a universe of difference between creativity and artistic vision. An artistic vision stems from purpose, from the human need to communicate something specific: an idea, a lived experience, a raw emotion.

AI has no artistic vision because it has not lived a human life. It has no scars, no heartbreaks, no triumphs. It cannot draw from the well of personal experience that makes art resonate.

I’m not anti-AI. I’m anti-mediocrity.

And I’m for you, the writer. The one who respects the craft and the reader. The one who knows that the magic is in telling a story only you can tell, not in generating AI slop.

Here is a passage from my guide, Trust Your Story:

The most impactful stories are authentic. They stem from genuine human experiences, not from mechanical adherence to formulas and plot templates. Don’t settle for mediocrity; aim for authenticity.

Some creators worry that advances in generative AI technology will make them obsolete.

Should we, as human creators, be concerned? I am not. No matter how advanced AI becomes, it cannot teach you how to be a successful storyteller or write deeply satisfying stories. While AI understands the mechanics of storytelling, it can’t grasp the nuances of human existence. Human-written text may be flawed, but it’s authentic, reflecting the style, character, emotions, voice, and lived experiences of a real person. For me, authenticity trumps stylistic perfection.

Trust Your Story

Now, what are your thoughts? I’m curious to hear your experiences and perspective. Leave a comment below.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: AI in publishing, AI writing, AI‑generated books, Amazon KDP, authors vs AI, Coral Hart, creative writing advice, emotional storytelling, generative AI, publishing industry news, self‑publishing, writing career, writing craft

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2

FOLLOW ME

Newsletter | Goodreads | YouTube

Copyright Will Raywood, 2025

Copyright © 2026 · Agency Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in